Free vehicle replacement decision matrix template
Jump to download form ↓Enter your email below to download this vehicle replacement decision matrix template as a ready-to-use PDF.
Free vehicle replacement decision matrix template. Score keep, repair, replace against five criteria per ISO 55001, AS/NZS ISO 31000 and ATO rules.
Commercial Director
Updated 25 May 2026
How to use: download the PDF, print or complete digitally on any device.
- PDF format, ready to print or fill on screen
- Use as-is or customise to suit your operation
- Go digital in MapTrack for photos, alerts and audit trails
Used by construction, mining and field service teams
What is a vehicle replacement decision matrix template?
A vehicle replacement decision matrix template is a structured scoring tool a fleet manager uses to decide whether each vehicle in the fleet should be kept in service as-is, repaired to address a known defect or cost issue, or replaced with a new or used substitute. It applies at three trigger points: when the cost-per-kilometre report shows a vehicle moving above the fleet refresh threshold, when a major repair quote is received that exceeds a defined percentage of the residual value, or as part of the annual fleet refresh planning cycle. The matrix captures the vehicle ID, current age in years and kilometres travelled life-to-date, current book value, estimated repair cost for any known defects, projected repair cost in the next 12 months based on cost-per-kilometre trend, fuel efficiency of the existing vehicle versus a replacement, downtime cost of running the existing vehicle versus the replacement, residual value at sell-now versus sell-in-12-months, scoring against five criteria (operating cost, reliability, downtime, fuel efficiency and resale curve) each rated 1 to 5, weighted total, the final recommendation (keep / repair / replace) and the funding source identified for any recommended replacement (capital purchase, lease, finance lease or operating lease).
The workflow runs from cost-per-kilometre report trigger or major repair quote, through residual value extract, replacement vehicle quote, scoring, weighted total calculation, recommendation and approval. AS/NZS ISO 55001 (Asset management systems) sets the management system expectation that asset lifecycle decisions are made on documented evidence rather than gut feel. AS/NZS ISO 31000 risk management drives the parallel duty that the replacement decision considers operational, safety, financial and reputation risk. Australian Tax Office depreciation rules require the residual value and any sale proceeds to align with the depreciation schedule, with the difference treated as a balancing adjustment on disposal under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. In MapTrack the matrix pulls cost-per-kilometre, defect log, downtime hours and book value automatically against the vehicle ID, with scoring and recommendation flowing into the procurement queue for the asset manager.
Learn more about gps and fleet tracking in MapTrack.
Benefits of using this vehicle replacement decision matrix template
- Evidence-based replacement decisions: scoring against five weighted criteria converts the abstract repair-versus-replace question into a defensible recommendation backed by data
- Multi-stakeholder alignment: a single matrix completed once is reviewed and signed by fleet manager, asset manager, finance and procurement so the decision is owned across the team
- Capital allocation discipline: matrix outputs feed the procurement queue with a ranked list of replacement candidates so capital is allocated to the assets with the strongest case
- Residual value optimisation: comparing sell-now versus sell-in-12-months residual values exposes the right timing window in the resale curve
- Funding source flexibility: identifying capital purchase, lease, finance lease or operating lease as the funding source at the decision point speeds the subsequent procurement and avoids late-stage funding rework
- Downtime cost transparency: downtime cost of running the existing vehicle versus the replacement is captured in the matrix so the productivity argument is visible, not buried
- Audit and board defensibility: a stamped, signed matrix is the primary evidence document at audit, board and finance committee review of fleet capital decisions
Benefits of digitising forms in MapTrack
When you digitise vehicle replacement matrix process documents in MapTrack, you get:
- Field users can easily scan a QR code to complete a form on mobile. Unlimited users.
- Automatically get alerts when faults are identified.
- Link every form digitally as a PDF to the relevant asset, location or person.
- Receive a digital PDF copy with every submission to your email.
- Ability to share forms digitally.
- Build conditional logic (show or hide questions based on answers).
- Take pictures or attach photos. Not possible with a paper-based form.
- Electronic signatures.
- Edit forms later without reprinting.
- Restrict permissions (who can view, complete or approve).
- Build forms with AI (describe what you need and MapTrack suggests the form).
- Monitor odometer and service-interval triggers across your entire fleet.
- Capture fuel receipts and trip logs alongside vehicle inspection data.
- Compare vehicle downtime and repair costs to inform replacement decisions.
Book a demo to see how MapTrack handles vehicle replacement matrix process documents.
Try MapTrack free for 30 days
Full access to every feature. No credit card required. Per-asset pricing so you scale as your fleet grows.
- No credit card required
- 30 days free trial
- Cancel anytime
Intuitive for field crews
“MapTrack's a great platform - intuitive for the guys out in the field and also has fantastic support.”

Matthew Anderson
Maintenance Planning Supervisor, Supagas
What to include in a vehicle replacement decision matrix template
This vehicle replacement decision matrix template covers 13 key areas:
- Vehicle identification: fleet number, registration, VIN, make/model, GVM class, year of manufacture and acquisition date
- Current age and utilisation: age in years, kilometres travelled life-to-date, utilisation rate versus expected and any major incidents in life-to-date
- Current book value: net book value per the depreciation schedule, written-down value for tax purposes and any accelerated depreciation events recorded
- Known defect cost: estimated repair cost for any known defects from the defect log, with quotes attached for any defect above the workshop hourly threshold
- Projected 12-month repair cost: projection from the cost-per-kilometre report trend, with the rolling 12-month maintenance figure annualised against expected utilisation
- Fuel efficiency comparison: existing vehicle fuel efficiency from the reconciliation log versus the manufacturer-rated efficiency of the replacement, valued at the current fuel price
- Downtime cost comparison: hours of downtime in the rolling 12 months for the existing vehicle versus the manufacturer-warranted downtime expectation of the replacement, valued at the production loss rate
- Residual value at sell-now versus sell-in-12-months: residual quotes from at least three sources (wholesaler, auction, retail), with the resale curve plotted to identify the optimal sale window
- Scoring against five criteria: operating cost, reliability, downtime, fuel efficiency and resale curve, each rated 1 to 5 with the rule for each rating stated
- Weighted total: weights applied to each criterion (typically operating cost 30 percent, reliability 25 percent, downtime 20 percent, fuel efficiency 15 percent, resale curve 10 percent), weighted total calculated
- Final recommendation: keep, repair (with quoted scope), or replace (with quoted vehicle, configuration and total cost of ownership)
- Funding source: capital purchase, lease, finance lease, operating lease, with cash flow profile and approval pathway identified
- Approval and sign-off: fleet manager, asset manager, finance, procurement and (for above-threshold capital) board or executive committee signatures with dates
How to use this vehicle replacement decision matrix template
- 1. Trigger the matrix at the right point: open a matrix when the cost-per-kilometre report shows the vehicle above the fleet refresh threshold, when a major repair quote exceeds a defined percentage of residual value (typically 30 to 50 percent), or as part of the annual fleet refresh planning cycle for any vehicle within 12 months of the fleet refresh trigger
- 2. Capture vehicle identification, age and utilisation: extract fleet number, registration, VIN, age in years, kilometres travelled life-to-date and utilisation rate from the asset register, and record any major incidents or insurance claims in life-to-date
- 3. Extract current book value and known defect costs: pull net book value from the depreciation schedule and written-down value from the tax fixed asset register, extract any known defect costs from the defect log with quotes attached for any defect above the workshop hourly threshold
- 4. Project 12-month repair cost from the cost-per-kilometre trend: take the rolling 12-month maintenance figure from the cost-per-kilometre report, annualise against expected utilisation and project the next 12 months including any condition-monitoring alarms flagged in the report
- 5. Compare fuel efficiency and downtime against a replacement: extract existing vehicle fuel efficiency from the reconciliation log, source manufacturer-rated efficiency for the proposed replacement, value at the current fuel price and compare downtime hours from the work order log against the manufacturer-warranted expectation for the replacement
- 6. Obtain residual value quotes from at least three sources: collect residual quotes from wholesaler, auction and retail channels for both sell-now and sell-in-12-months timing, plot the resale curve and identify the optimal sale window
- 7. Score against the five criteria and apply weights: rate operating cost, reliability, downtime, fuel efficiency and resale curve each 1 to 5 with the rule for each rating stated, apply weights (typically operating cost 30 percent, reliability 25 percent, downtime 20 percent, fuel efficiency 15 percent, resale curve 10 percent) and calculate the weighted total
- 8. Make the recommendation and identify the funding source: select keep, repair (with quoted scope), or replace (with quoted vehicle, configuration and total cost of ownership), identify the funding source (capital purchase, lease, finance lease, operating lease) and outline the cash flow profile
- 9. Route for approval and post to procurement: distribute the matrix for fleet manager, asset manager, finance, procurement and (for above-threshold capital) board or executive committee sign-off, file against the vehicle in the asset lifecycle decision file and post any replace recommendation into the procurement queue with the ranked candidate position
In MapTrack, you can track your fleet with gps and digital pre-starts. Each submission is stored as a timestamped PDF against the asset record.
Get the free templateEnter your email above to download the full vehicle replacement decision matrix template as a PDF.Back to download formHow often should you complete this process document?
The matrix is event-driven, not calendar-driven, with three primary triggers. The first trigger is the cost-per-kilometre report showing a vehicle moving above the fleet refresh threshold (typically defined by age in years or kilometres travelled life-to-date or a cost-per-kilometre figure above the fleet average for the vehicle class). The second trigger is a major repair quote received from an in-house technician or external workshop that exceeds a defined percentage of residual value (typically 30 to 50 percent depending on vehicle class and remaining useful life). The third trigger is the annual fleet refresh planning cycle, in which every vehicle within 12 months of any of the fleet refresh trigger criteria runs through the matrix as part of the capital budget process. Any major incident, accident write-off, insurance claim above a dollar threshold, change to operational requirements (route change, payload change, regulatory change) or unexpected residual value movement (used vehicle market shift, fuel price step-change) triggers an out-of-cycle matrix review of the affected vehicles.
Frequently asked questions
Applicable regulatory standards
This template aligns with the following regulations and standards:
- AS/NZS ISO 55001 (Asset management systems)
- AS/NZS ISO 31000 (Risk management)
- Australian Tax Office depreciation rules (ITAA 1997)
- AS/NZS ISO 39001 (Road traffic safety management systems)
Need to track your fleet with gps and digital pre-starts?
Register every vehicle replacement matrix in MapTrack, attach digital forms, and get a complete history of every inspection, service and compliance record.
GPS and fleet tracking · All templates · Pricing · Book a demo