Free cmms evaluation checklist
Jump to download form ↓Enter your email below to download this cmms evaluation checklist as a ready-to-use PDF.
Free CMMS evaluation checklist (PDF-ready). Weighted vendor scoring across functional, technical, commercial and fit criteria. Download free.
Commercial Director
Updated 15 May 2026
How to use: download the PDF, print or complete digitally on any device.
- PDF format, ready to print or fill on screen
- Use as-is or customise to suit your operation
- Go digital in MapTrack for photos, alerts and audit trails
Download free PDF template
Trusted by teams across Australia and New Zealand
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.
Used by construction, mining and field service teams
What is a cmms evaluation checklist?
A CMMS evaluation checklist is a structured procurement document used by maintenance leaders, operations directors and IT to compare computerised maintenance management system (CMMS) vendors against a common, weighted set of criteria. Rather than walking into vendor demos with a vague feature list and walking out with whichever salesperson was most persuasive, the checklist forces a disciplined process: stakeholders agree the criteria, agree the relative weight of each criterion, then score each shortlisted vendor on a consistent 1 to 5 rubric. The weighted scores are summed, vendors are ranked, and the decision becomes defensible to the executive sponsor, the procurement function and any auditor who later asks how the selection was made. The methodology is consistent with the asset management decision-making principles in ISO 55001:2024 and with standard B2B software procurement practice.
Structured CMMS evaluation matters because the cost of a bad selection is enormous and almost always understated. A failed CMMS implementation typically forces an 18-month rip-and-replace: licences are paid for software that never went live, integration spend is sunk, and the maintenance team is back where it started but with less budget and less internal credibility. The most common failure mode is not a bad vendor, it is a structurally good vendor selected against the wrong criteria. The weighted scoring methodology addresses both risks. By setting weights with stakeholders before any demo is booked, the buyer locks in priorities while the discussion is still about the business rather than a specific product. By scoring vendors against a 1 to 5 rubric with documented evidence, the buyer produces an audit trail that protects the decision from second-guessing once the honeymoon ends. Each criterion carries a weight expressed as a percentage; the weights total exactly 100% and are locked before any vendor sees a demo invitation. Each shortlisted vendor is scored on every criterion, the weighted score for a criterion is the raw score multiplied by the weight percentage, and the weighted scores are summed per vendor, yielding a total out of 5.00. The template is vendor-neutral.
Learn more about asset tracking in MapTrack.
Benefits of using this cmms evaluation checklist
- Objective vendor comparison: weighted scoring replaces salesperson charisma and demo theatre with a numeric, evidence-backed comparison that procurement and the executive sponsor can defend.
- Stakeholder alignment: workshopping criteria and weights before any vendor demo forces operations, IT, finance, security and the executive sponsor to agree on priorities while the discussion is still about business outcomes.
- Scope discipline: the must-have versus nice-to-have split prevents the most common evaluation failure of letting one loud stakeholder add their pet feature to the must-have list halfway through scoring.
- Defensible decision and audit trail: the completed matrix, scoring evidence and signed-off recommendation create a procurement audit trail that protects the decision-maker eighteen months later.
- Risk reduction on feature-led traps: scoring commercial terms, security posture, implementation methodology and vendor stability alongside features prevents choosing the prettiest demo and discovering the contract is wrong six weeks later.
- Faster procurement cycle: a documented evaluation framework shortens the typical CMMS selection from six months of unstructured conversations to eight to twelve weeks of structured stages.
Benefits of digitising forms in MapTrack
When you move your checklists from paper to MapTrack, you get:
- Field users can easily scan a QR code to complete a form on mobile. Unlimited users.
- Automatically get alerts when faults are identified.
- Link every form digitally as a PDF to the relevant asset, location or person.
- Receive a digital PDF copy with every submission to your email.
- Ability to share forms digitally.
- Build conditional logic (show or hide questions based on answers).
- Take pictures or attach photos. Not possible with a paper-based form.
- Electronic signatures.
- Edit forms later without reprinting.
- Restrict permissions (who can view, complete or approve).
- Build forms with AI (describe what you need and MapTrack suggests the form).
- Maintain a live asset register with location, condition and custody history.
- Schedule and track calibration, certification and warranty expiry dates.
- Generate depreciation and total-cost-of-ownership reports per asset.
Book a demo to see how MapTrack handles checklists.
Try MapTrack free for 30 days
Full access to every feature. No credit card required. Per-asset pricing so you scale as your fleet grows.
- No credit card required
- 30 days free trial
- Cancel anytime
1-2 days/week saved
“Bloody amazing! We used to spend 1-2 days a week tracking and managing our generators alone.”
Steve McAllister
Asset Coordinator, Saunders International
What to include in a cmms evaluation checklist
This cmms evaluation checklist covers 8 key areas:
- Stakeholder list and weights: named individuals representing operations, maintenance, IT, security, procurement, finance and the executive sponsor, each with a documented role in setting weights and signing off the recommendation.
- Must-have versus nice-to-have features: a clear separation between operational requirements that any acceptable vendor must deliver and capabilities that are desirable but should not eliminate an otherwise strong vendor.
- Vendor scoring rubric (1 to 5 scale): a documented rubric defining what each score means, with score 5 reserved for capabilities demonstrated on the buyer data and score 1 reserved for capabilities not on the public roadmap.
- Commercial criteria: total cost of ownership over three years (subscription, implementation, integrations, training), contract terms (term length, exit clauses, price escalation caps), payment milestones.
- Security and compliance: current SOC 2 Type II report status, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, data residency options, single sign-on support, role-based access control and audit log capabilities.
- Implementation and change management: defined implementation methodology, named customer success manager, fixed-scope statement of work option, change management materials, train-the-trainer programme.
- References and demo scoring: structured reference call template with at least three customers of similar scale, scripted demo agendas focused on the buyer actual workflows, scoring rubric applied consistently across vendors.
- Decision summary and sign-off: the recommended vendor, the winning weighted total, the rationale, residual risks and mitigations, and three signature blocks for technical, commercial and executive sponsor approval.
How to use this cmms evaluation checklist
- Define scope and weight criteria with stakeholders before any vendor demo is booked, locking in priorities while the conversation is still about business outcomes.: Convene a one-hour workshop with the operations director, head of maintenance, IT director, finance, security and the executive sponsor. Agree the scope in writing: how many sites, how many users, which asset classes, which integrations are mandatory. Walk through the ten default criteria and adjust weights until they reflect your organisation priorities and total exactly 100%. Document any must-have features that would veto a vendor regardless of total score. The weights and must-haves are locked before the first vendor pitch.
- Build a vendor longlist from analyst reports, peer recommendations and industry coverage, then shortlist to three to five vendors that clear the must-have filter.: Start with eight to twelve candidates drawn from analyst coverage (G2, Capterra, Gartner Magic Quadrant where relevant), peer recommendations from comparable organisations and any vendors already in conversation with internal stakeholders. Apply a written knockout filter: vendors must demonstrate the must-have features, must serve organisations of comparable scale, must operate in your geography and must have a current SOC 2 Type II report. Send a short request-for-information to remaining vendors. Shortlist three to five vendors that pass.
- Run scripted demos and technical scoring sessions with each shortlisted vendor, scoring each criterion on the 1 to 5 rubric with documented evidence.: Send each shortlisted vendor an identical demo script built around your actual workflows, not their canned product tour: create a work order, assign it on mobile, complete it offline, raise a PM, run an MTBF report, configure SSO. Insist on a working sandbox or trial environment for technical scoring of the API, integrations and security controls. Score each criterion immediately after the demo while it is fresh, with evidence in the notes column. Use the same scorer or scoring panel for every vendor to remove inter-rater variance.
- Complete commercial scoring and reference calls with three to five customers of comparable scale for each shortlisted vendor.: Request a fully-loaded three-year total cost of ownership proposal from each vendor including subscription, implementation, integration services, training and the all-in price. Score commercial criteria on the same 1 to 5 rubric, paying particular attention to contract exit clauses, price escalation caps and whether the proposal includes the integrations you actually need. Run structured reference calls with at least three customers per vendor at comparable scale: ask about implementation experience, support quality and hidden costs.
- Make the decision, sign the contract and lock implementation planning in writing before the procurement team disbands.: Sum the weighted scores per vendor, rank them, and convene the original stakeholder group to confirm the recommendation. Document the decision rationale, residual risks and mitigations in the recommendation summary. Have the technical, commercial and executive sponsor sign-offs completed before contract negotiations begin so the decision is anchored. During contract negotiation, attach the evaluation criteria to the statement of work so the vendor is contractually committed to deliver what they scored against.
In MapTrack, you can manage your full asset register digitally. Each submission is stored as a timestamped PDF against the asset record.
Get the free templateEnter your email above to download the full cmms evaluation checklist as a PDF.Back to download formHow often should you complete this checklist?
Formal CMMS evaluation should happen at three trigger points. The first is the initial CMMS purchase: the organisation has been running maintenance on spreadsheets, paper or a legacy in-house system and has decided to invest in a purpose-built CMMS. The second trigger is major dissatisfaction with the incumbent: the current CMMS is blocking growth, the mobile experience is unusable, integrations have broken, or an acquisition has created a need to consolidate multiple CMMS instances onto a single platform. The third trigger is contract renewal at a natural breakpoint, typically every three to five years. Even if the incumbent is performing acceptably, a structured re-evaluation at renewal protects against price creep and creates real negotiating power. Outside these triggers, CMMS evaluation is not an annual exercise. Once a CMMS is selected and live, the team should focus on getting value from it for three to five years before reopening the question.
Frequently asked questions
Applicable regulatory standards
This template aligns with the following regulations and standards:
- ISO 55001:2024 (Asset management - Management systems - Requirements; informs decision-making criteria)
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (Information security management systems; required as a vendor security criterion)
- ISO 9001:2015 (Quality management systems; supplier evaluation and selection principles)
- SOC 2 Type II (AICPA Trust Services Criteria; standard SaaS vendor security evidence)
Embed this free template on your website
Run an industry blog, trade association site, or training resource? Drop a preview of this free cmms evaluation checklist straight into your page. The snippet is self-contained, needs no scripts, and links readers back to the full free template.
<div style="max-width:480px;font-family:system-ui,-apple-system,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;border:1px solid #E5E7EB;border-radius:12px;padding:20px;background:#ffffff;">
<p style="font-size:12px;font-weight:700;letter-spacing:0.05em;text-transform:uppercase;color:#0E7490;margin:0;">Free template</p>
<p style="font-size:18px;font-weight:700;color:#071D49;margin:6px 0 0;">CMMS evaluation checklist</p>
<ul style="margin:12px 0 0;padding-left:18px;color:#374151;font-size:14px;line-height:1.6;">
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Stakeholder list and weights: named individuals representing operations, maintenance, IT, security, procurement, finance and the executive sponsor, each with a documented role in setting weights and signing off the recommendation.</li>
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Must-have versus nice-to-have features: a clear separation between operational requirements that any acceptable vendor must deliver and capabilities that are desirable but should not eliminate an otherwise strong vendor.</li>
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Vendor scoring rubric (1 to 5 scale): a documented rubric defining what each score means, with score 5 reserved for capabilities demonstrated on the buyer data and score 1 reserved for capabilities not on the public roadmap.</li>
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Commercial criteria: total cost of ownership over three years (subscription, implementation, integrations, training), contract terms (term length, exit clauses, price escalation caps), payment milestones.</li>
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Security and compliance: current SOC 2 Type II report status, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, data residency options, single sign-on support, role-based access control and audit log capabilities.</li>
<li style="margin:4px 0;">Implementation and change management: defined implementation methodology, named customer success manager, fixed-scope statement of work option, change management materials, train-the-trainer programme.</li>
</ul>
<p style="font-size:13px;color:#6B7280;margin:14px 0 0;padding-top:12px;border-top:1px solid #E5E7EB;">Free <a href="https://www.maptrack.com/templates/cmms-evaluation-checklist" style="color:#071D49;font-weight:600;text-decoration:none;">CMMS evaluation checklist</a> by MapTrack</p>
</div>Please keep the “by MapTrack” attribution link in the snippet.
Need to manage your full asset register digitally?
Register every asset in MapTrack, attach digital forms, and get a complete history of every inspection, service and compliance record.